<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nationalization or Expropriation?  Independent Facebook Application Developers Continue to Face Uncertainty</title>
	<atom:link href="http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm</link>
	<description>because, it is better.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:14:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm/comment-page-1#comment-45177</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm#comment-45177</guid>
		<description>This is a serious breach of ethics, Face book, being a large site can take recognition of a piece of software and work that someone else has done. This is seriously wrong. Lets &#039;face&#039; it no-one reads the fine print and this is where people get caught out.
We all have &quot;intellectual property&quot; and you must think that if they are to take it, certainly they have to source the person for creating that idea or program.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a serious breach of ethics, Face book, being a large site can take recognition of a piece of software and work that someone else has done. This is seriously wrong. Lets &#8216;face&#8217; it no-one reads the fine print and this is where people get caught out.<br />
We all have &#8220;intellectual property&#8221; and you must think that if they are to take it, certainly they have to source the person for creating that idea or program.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke</title>
		<link>http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm/comment-page-1#comment-43053</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2008 16:47:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm#comment-43053</guid>
		<description>Seriously, it was only a matter of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, it was only a matter of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary</title>
		<link>http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm/comment-page-1#comment-40179</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 19:55:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://banagale.com/nationalization-or-expropriation-facebook-application-developers-continue-to-face-uncertainty.htm#comment-40179</guid>
		<description>This is why people must learn to read the Terms of Service legalese (or legal-unease, as it were).  It is so easy for lawyers to slip this kind of rights-stripping language in and no one&#039;s the wiser until a company takes advantage of its users&#039; work. We can&#039;t assume that a company won&#039;t take advantage of us when its TOS explicitly state that we&#039;re giving them every right to do so.

Nice post, Rob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is why people must learn to read the Terms of Service legalese (or legal-unease, as it were).  It is so easy for lawyers to slip this kind of rights-stripping language in and no one&#8217;s the wiser until a company takes advantage of its users&#8217; work. We can&#8217;t assume that a company won&#8217;t take advantage of us when its TOS explicitly state that we&#8217;re giving them every right to do so.</p>
<p>Nice post, Rob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
